Cerruti
Cerruti 1881 Intense Pour Homme

Seu armário
Entre para dizer que você tem, já testou ou quer este perfume. Suas marcações ficam privadas por padrão.
Criar conta é grátis e leva menos de um minuto.
Acordes dominantes
- amadeirado
- aromático
- especiado fresco
- verde
- conífera
- couro
Pirâmide olfativa
Saída
O primeiro impacto, nos primeiros 15 minutos.
Coração
A personalidade do perfume, por algumas horas.
Fundo
O rastro que fica na pele até o fim do dia.
Como ele se comporta
Fixação, projeção e ocasião — votos da comunidade internacional somados aos daqui.
Gênero
3 votos
Quando usar
- Inverno: 0 votos
- Primavera: 4 votos
- Verão: 3 votos
- Outono: 2 votos
- Dia: 4 votos
- Noite: 2 votos
Onde encontrar
Nenhum decant à venda nem vaquinha aberta agora. Marque Quero ali em cima — é o interesse da comunidade que puxa a próxima vaquinha.
Ver vaquinhas abertasQuem gosta deste também gosta
Perfumes próximos no gosto de quem curte este — bons candidatos para o próximo decant.
Impressões da comunidade internacional
Traduções chegam aos poucos — textos em inglês por enquanto.
- em inglês
Not that I expect anyone to care but, as a middle-aged Northern European man, I'm drawn more to classic woody chypres and fougeres heading off in the direction of the barbershop (many of them fragrances my dad might've liked) than to latter-day gourmands etc. I feel they go well with the cooler seasons in my country, with its temperate, often rainy climate. The problem is that I find many of the classics unwearable. Too much moss, musk and/or spice (coumarin?), for instance, and I can find them overpowering and often too animalic, as if I might be spraying on eau de body odour, whether that's just down to the fragrances or partly to my skin chemistry. Worth Pour Homme might be the prime example. Others, such as Tsar, I find excessively soapy and/or powdery, at least in the drydown. I bought a bottle of the original Cerruti 1881 a few years ago and, although I like the smell and find it impressively refined, I haven't worn it very much. I like it more now than I did at first but I still find it a little sharp, soapy-powdery and thin. It's perhaps a little dated in the mossy-manly way and also reminds me of any number of sporty sherbet-lemon fresh-out-of-the-shower colognes from maybe 30 years ago. I've seldom worn it for anything other than a quick burst of casual daytime freshness with a little added funk. All the same, it's a scent that I've almost wanted to like more than I actually have. I've seen great potential there. I therefore blind-bought this Intense flanker on the understanding, from a couple of reviews, that it was similar to the original but perhaps more--well--intense. I couldn't be much happier with my purchase. Now, I do see that it might not be what some people would expect from a flanker bearing the epithet 'Intense'. I think the sillage and longevity are probably similar to those of the original, i.e. by no means extreme. This is not a shoutier version of the original. To me, though, it is indeed more intense--darker/warmer, woodier, spicier, fuller, much muskier and more classically masculine, even though the original fresh, soapy aspect is still obvious. I find it to be like a more wearable take on the original and some of those heavier old classics such as Worth. It's pretty much everything I'd have liked the original to be and as such probably my new favourite Spring/Autumn fragrance when another favourite of mine, L'Eau Bleue D'Issey, seems a touch too heavy or not quite ruggedly woody or masculine enough. Edit: If anything, this is a little too skanky when sprayed directly on my skin in any quantity. I've taken to layering it with the original sometimes. The two are similar enough for that to work very well. This is definitely one for walk-through misting (my default setting) but even then it's probably best to err absolutely on the side of caution and not go above maybe three sprays. Never again would I mist a work shirt with this or wear this in warm weather, as my smelling like some kind of stubborn subtropical rainforest fire just the once was enough for me, let alone everyone around me at work.
- em inglês
An indeed more intense version of the original. Less citrusy, more piney & woody and overall a better performance while keeping the backbone of the original. Its a classy, manly, fresh fragrance of modern times. I like it a lot!!!
- em inglês
A beginning is strong, very fresh, reminds me ocean breeze. With time it smells better and better. After about 5 minutes 1881 Intense opens itself and reveals the notes of citrus and forrest. Very tasty, fresh. Smells like Davidoff's classic Cool Water. To me - it's wonderful to wear it at noon, on sunny day. A big advantage of this scent is it's deepness and ability to change itself in time. Unfortunately, when it fades out, it becomes very bland.
- em inglês
Always loved original 1881 and never thought smth could replace it in their own league I was wrong 1881 Intense has absolutely same DNA as his father but it's warmer, deeper and the way more wearable in modern days Such a nice surprise ! Luv it !
- em inglês
Nice strong masculine fragrance with not bad longevity.
- em inglês
Nice pleasant fresh, modern and classy at the same time. I probably would buy it again, keep in mind, you don#t really stand out, but it smells woody and pleasing. Performance: 5-7 hours Sillage: Arms Length For whom: Gentlemen >30 My background: I only write reviews about scents I have worn already (until the bottle is finished or given away) or are in current use. I'm a Gentlemen - middle aged - predominantly in an executive office environment wearing suits and representing with many official gatherings.
- em inglês
First dab sampling: Though the note pyramids are clearly different this isn't too far from Rive Gauche Pour Homme Intense, at least when you get to the drydown. At that point, the patchouli is obvious and it's got the same dry anisic/herbal quality, which may be the fir and a couple of the other notes generating a similar effect. It's natural smelling and nicely balanced, but you have to like patchouli UPDATE: With a regular wearing the sandalwood note is more obvious and the patchouli less obvious. This is not a Cool Water type of scent because it does not possess the large amount of "fresh" aroma chemicals in those scents. Instead, this an "old school" dusty/dry idea that focuses on "masculine" elements (wood, leather, etc.). It's also not nearly as sweet as Cool Water, and in fact only has the slightest hint of sweetness.
- em inglês
Cerruti 1881 has so many versions,although I go through the original one and amber blend,I consider this one as the sexiest. still it's faithful to the tradition of the brand,but this time it becomes warmer and more spicy.again it's very GREEN. for men who are interested in woody & specially pine scent(I know a lot of them!) it's #1 cup of the tea. unfortunately I've just found 100 ml of this cologne.if I find the 50 ml by chance I'll buy it for one of them without hesitation;)
- em inglês
This one seems to be discontinued. Company website lists among men's perfumes: Cerruti 1881 Vivo, Cerruti 1881 Pour Homme, Cerruti 1881 Silver and Cerruti 1881 Silver Night. Can I have confirmation, please?
- em inglês
I love the original CERRUTI 1881 POUR HOMME and i am looking for the INTENSE version now. But help, can't find it nowhere! Any suggestions where to buy it? Please send me a PM.
- em inglês
I have a full 100ml bottle of this i don't want, only had a couple sprays out of it, still boxed if anyone wants to buy? Based in UK.
- em inglês
@GGVV Yes it's discountinued , long time ago
- em inglês
@maodo Frangrancenet.com has it in stock
Resenhas da comunidade
0 comentáriosEntre na sua conta para comentar e resenhar.
EntrarAinda ninguém resenhou este perfume
Seja a primeira pessoa a contar como ele se comporta na pele: projeção, fixação e a ocasião certa.
Encontrou um erro ou falta informação? A comunidade melhora o catálogo junto.





