Duc de Vervins

opening the box, i relaized that i was supposed to smell something very masculine that rings a bell for something else....and i was trying to recall which perfume smells the same. Unfortunately, i was unable to identify the perfume and finally, that was because DV reminds me two perfumes, not one. it is a mix of two perfumes, drakkar noir and Tsar. it took vide of drakkar and the soapy smell of Tsar. Tsar for me is much better than Drakkar but DV is better than Tsar. we are talking for a strong perfume that indeed makes a statement...."I'm a strong perfume for mature men". The scent is rather old fashioned but can be wore today especially in autumn and winter. It is not a sport perfume but a classic office or night one. Immediately you identify the citrus, spice and greeness once you apply....after some minutes, you are still getting them with a touch of soap. the perfume lasts and lasts almost all day.....i give 9/10 for all, longevity, sillage etc and is doesnt get 10 of 10 due to the fact that is old fashioned. On this subject, i would like to point out something. nowadays, all mainstream companies are producing almost identical perfumes so the public has either to move to a niche one (those that can affort) or to find something that is not so common and these perfumes are either old or not so well known. Niche perfumes and especially creed have been copied by mainstream companies but sometimes, mainstream companies have been copied by niche ones. UPDATE the perfume is very classy and especially in fall/winter, very refreshing with green woody smell.....masterpiece but you have to appreciate.

I'm really liking this one. I must try the extreme. This one doesn't perform well. It's amazing while it last. I'm sure the old formula with more oakmoss is amazing. I get some similarities to drakkar noir but this one is quite different. The bergamot, lavender, oakmoss patchouli smell is familiar. It goes It's own way with the soapy sultry green somewhat aquatic feel I'm getting. Smells like a good amount of high quality naturals and performs like it's not getting much synthetic carrier help. Atelier Colognes type quality and performance. People can say it smells dated but I think that's some kind of resentment or something. This type of perfumery will always be timeless. I'm looking forward to getting the extreme even though my fragrance que keeps altering. Top notch woodlands scent. More spicy green than dark. Of the nearly 10 fragrances I tested last month. This one has been the most compelling to wear. There is a bit of nostalgia maybe due to me regularly wearing cologne as a kid in the 80s. I hit up all my uncles and grandpa's fragrances and they all would give me one. If this performed like the 80s I would be in love.

I just LOVE this stuff! Clean, forest, green, celery, cucumber, fresh air, flowing stream...these are the things this scent brings to my mind. Drakkar Noir? Uh...sorry...not seeing it. I don't get the comparison with Drakkar. Drakkar was the stuff all the guys in my highschool were wearing (if they weren't wearing Polo). Drakkar smells "cheap" next to this one, in my opinion. My wife and I really like DV alot but neither of us likes Drakkar. I'd go as far to say that they are in different classes. Drakkar is pedestrian; DV is elite. No insult intended toward Drakkar men. I know many women who think Drakkar smells fantastic on a man. I just think DV smells substantially better. If you're a Drakkar man, pay me no mind...carry on. This scent is amazingly clean, green, and masculine to me. Definitely a keeper! The only complaint I could have--which could be said of many fragrances--is that the EdT is a bit short-lived. I put on a generous amount to see how my wife liked it on me and after about 3 hours, it was very faint. I suppose that's to be expected with an EdT. I think debborra said sums it up much better than I can.

I don't mind admitting I've become a big fan of these "dated" 80's men's colognes a.k.a. "powerhouses". We shouldn't need to spray so much we get a headache or that great nostril burn. We shouldn't need to layer it with a soap & deodorant just to smell it on ourselves for more than 2 hrs. There's nothing wrong with a powerhouse, the real problem is the relative weakness of so many short lived skin-scents passing for men's cologne now. Slumping popular taste is causing gems like this to go undiscovered or overlooked by many who are new to fragrances. Another example of slumping popular taste, the fact that Davidoff's Relax was discontinued. Coty made the decision based on lack of demand, or perhaps a good reformulation was proving hard to create. In any case, this is one of those great green colognes that will always be in my collection. P.S. The EDP version L'Extreme is great as well. Just different enough to make it necessary to have both imho.

just got a couple of package samples of this.wow i was impressed as a fan of 80's scents, never had been exposed to this one.had the houbigant musk a long time ago..this is a wonderful masculine scent..i can sort of see the drakkar comparison, but i find more appealing than that even though i liked drakkar..i prefer this one..i get a sort of azzaro type feel as well..at the opening for me. i will purchase some very soon..i would love to have this one for my rotation...i could see myself wearing this more than i thought i might. it is a very clean scent...not really getting the leather feeling i get from fuel for men from donna karan....so i can find my self adding this and putting right on the side of bottle of fuel. nice one.i get pretty good longivity with this one as well, i think is is a lovely frangrance,2 thumbs up with a snap from me..

To me, this is a cross of Tsar and Loewe Pour Homme, with a bit of Gucci Nobile too. In the opening, you are introduced with an elegant green smoky aroma of fir, pine, and moss. As it slowly dries down, the basil and geranium become much more apparent, and this is where I find the resemblance to Loewe Pour Homme discernible, but a lot greener. In the far drydown you are rewarded with an herbal, clean, virile composition with an undeniable tranquil contemplative character. A gorgeous fougere from top to bottom, with a very fine green shaving foam smell that I find undeniably upscale and masculine. The vintage is a bit more natural and refined and has a silky smooth leathery complexion to the likes of Masculine Pluriel, which gives the composition a slightly different feel from the current formulation. Own both, but prefer the vintage.

Sometimes a fragrance just sneaks up on you and makes you fall in love. This is undeniably masculine, and virile. It is also fresh. A lot of very green scents will go funny on skin. They become sort of rotten smelling. Duc de Vervins does not suffer from this problem. It stays lovely through out. If you read my Gli Odori review, you'll know that I like the cuminy smell that rises from, I guess, the celery seed. There is a hint of that in this Houbigant, however it is much more subdued. Here, it's a interesting contrast to the sweet and citrus notes without any sweat connotations. I love this smell, perhaps passionately. No, Andy, I didn't get leather. But I wasn't searching for it.

PS: after a few days of wearing this, i find it a very well done, charming, manly, classy, invigorating fragrance. Its one of those giants which you need to give time. Judging this from the top notes after the initial spray is a huge mistake. First of all, give it a full day wearing. This is not your usual easy come / easy go scent. This is performing (and changing) throughout the entire day. Its amazing how the citrus comes forward after 4-5 hours wearing the fragrance under your shirt, where its get boosted by your body heat. Lovely and lively green with citrus and oak moss make this a perfect signature scent for the 35+ aged gentleman.

Now Iam gonna write something which Iam sure nobody picked up yet. the was a fragrance from Amyway (yes Amway) which was called Bois d'Ebene. I wore that 23 years ago and utterly loved it for its green, woody vibe. It disappeared never to be found again. Actually Anway had a very nice line up at the time! Now, DV just brought me back to exactly that scent. Its almost the same. I think Amway may have copied this at the time. I am grateful to my Friend John who sent me this as I have found a long lost friend....

One of the very few men's fragrances my husband likes. I love it too. It has green notes and isn't so sweet and fruity, a combination which is pretty hard to find these days. And, for the record, some of us have no unpleasant baggage with Drakkar Noir. We discovered it in the late 90s and fell in love with it. I still think it is a fabulous men's fragrance, one of the few he and I both love. Both DV and Drakkar Noir lack a lot of the trendy and synthetic notes we hate so much in current scents.

Epic Journey Into the Bottled Yonder, 148 ------------------------------------------------------- Purchased August 2019 Beats everything that tries to be Drakkar Noir. Still wishing I could have L'Extreme. Lasts all day but in the first 15 minutes there's that strange vegetable note, after a little overspray, that I've spoken about in my Stetson Country and Aspen Discovery reviews. It actually goes away in this one and so it becomes a scent of class and luxury. Duc the Duke.

If you love Drakkar Noir you will also love Duc De Vervins. Drakkar Noir is everyday masculine scent, this is more like niche version, smells very similar but you can tell it's more quality and refined. Drakkar Noir is still my favorite fragrance of all time, but Duc De Vervins is for sure one of the best for fougère lovers.

Since I have this one and tsar I can say, vervins does not smells like tsar. I like both, but in my opinion they are not even close. With me vervins is long lasting, does not bother me or others. It's a masculine scent and I feel very confident wearing this one. Certainly, I will always have one vervins in my collection.

Duc de Vernis fresh green and amber smell and a woody aromatic fragrance.Have it allure and it is strong and long lasting.Tsar this smell is same..but more raw. This is have very good allure..8/10

This is Drakkar Noire without the cheap dihydromercinol. Instead there is a beautiful patchouli in the base that interacts nicely with the oak moss to give great depth.

somewhat similar to drakkar noir but reminds me more of azzaro acteur. drakkar noir is better.

In my opinion one of the best ever made. I simply can't be without The Duke in my collection.

Very green and well-made aromatic fougere fashioned in the classic style - from the house (Houbigant) that made the first ever fougere (Fougere Royale) in 1882. There is tradition here and it comes out in this bottle. It's been around for 20 years, yet under the radar to most. Other fougeres from the 70's and 80's dominated the space...Paco Rabanne Pour Homme, Azzaro, Drakkar Noir, Tsar, etc. I am glad I came "back" to this. Shamus1 and marioslg3 have great perspective here, and debbborra hits a key note that is prevalent to my olfactory senses - the celery seed (& possibly cumin?) Definitely separating this from Drakkar Noir. It stays green, but slightly austere and a touch dry if applied light (I found the key is to apply close to the skin and let it saturate/focus) - the scent shows much better this way. Please see my update below. I have to believe that the slight dry spice is the cumin/celery seed note, but it is warmed with the amber in the base. The oakmoss still provides some great depth - but there is a dusty vibe in the heart that extends into the drydown of oakmoss if applied light and from distance. I don't dislike it and have actually found nice note separation here (which is a 'tip of the hat' to the qualiy of the ingredients), but it also eliminates this from all the immediate comparisons. Which I'm glad, because I would buy Guy Laroche's bottle if I wanted that. To a beginner, the differences are subtle - to a refined nose, they are very apparent. The overall scent pyramid is spot on with Shamus1's - "lime, basil, sage, juniper and, above all, OAKMOSS". I would like to add to that a pinch of lavender, dash of artemisia in the top (the main point where I get the Drakkar Noir association), dried rosemary, and a touch of fir that my nose picked up. Once the initial citrus fades (which also includes bergamot & lemon), this turns into a nice warm, well-integrated fougere - plus that cumin/celery seed note enters, lingering through the base for me - giving a touch drier moss (lichen) note than expected. Still good, but...different. Very natural, indeed. Well done. All in all - I like this bottle & am glad I got it. It has a hint of 'brash' macho, but is more about refinement...at the same time. A good fragrance, but not as easily wearable as Drakkar Noir for me - which can be casual or formal...Duc de Vervins stays more formal. Revised score after further wearing next to Drakkar Noir & Tsar - 7.5+/10. A solid composition of quality that would be excellent with proper attire - if you have a houndstooth vest (or jacket) and sport a nice derby hat, this would be excellent scent to compliment. ;-) *Update* - I wore this several more times and have enjoyed each wearing. There is definitive quality in this bottle. The cumin/celery seed note, while still a note in the composition, actually shows more when one applies this lightly and sprays from distance. It is a unique note that I am not totally turned off by, but I found that close application (just an inch or so off your skin) and apply liberally...this really keeps Duc de Vervins more "damp" and mossy - the drydown more green & fresh. Try it, if you want. I also like to apply this to my neck with an unscented after shave balm, which further adds moisture...so not on dry skin. And, finally, a layered application helps as well. Apply close, let it get to the late heart & beginning of the drydown and layer another few sprays directly on top. This really brings the citrus, lavender, and mossy greenness to the forefront. The cumin note is actually rather faint - it becomes more integrated less 'intrusive'. Once I did this a couple of times, I realized the affinity I have with this fragrance is actually stronger. Comparisons aside - Duc de Vervins is not a "subsitute" in my collection for Drakkar Noir or Tsar - but a great bottle of scent on its own merit. I, personally, find something unique and different in all three bottles and each offers something very good (or even excellent). Revised score - 7.8/10. Cheers.

(My Perfumed Court sample started to evaporate before my current round of sniffing this, so hopefully I only lost solvent and the smell is still true.) This is a really nice green scent, and a wealthier relative of Drakkar Noir, as everyone else has said. More specifically I'd place it into the space between the smokier, butterier DN and the brighter, sweeter Bowling Green. The opening is a refreshing medium green, neither very bright with unnecessary citrus nor very dark with moss and vetiver. Its sweetness falls toward the sweet end of being believably grassy, and goes no further for the time being. Soon it starts to get bracingly sharp, and a little musky from up close...very masculine, almost like taking the piney components of Yatagan or Polo without much of the leather or the harsher herbs. Scents like those two have led me to place a limit on how sharp I'm willing to go, and DdV falls just shy of that limit. By the base, it develops a sweet undercurrent similar to BG's cinnamon leaf, but DdV has slightly less of it than BG, and I'd say does a better job of it, maybe with some extra cedar. As a side note, this is a classy, upscale product, and I'm sure they wanted it to come across as very "old money." Unfortunately the big gold initials on the bottle look like something a rapper would wear on a neck chain, or the logo that a 1950s Texas oil millionaire would engrave on the gates to his ranch...decidedly "new money." Very strange contradiction in packaging.

This is pretty much a standard classic fougère, with all the expected ingredients (lavender, geranium, and oakmoss) and with some rosemary dominant. Fragrantica classifies this as a leather, but I just can't smell that note in it. It's elegantly blended and has quite a lot of power behind it (it's very much of its era--the 80s, not the 70s as someone claims below), and it's pretty linear except for the later development of the oakmoss. It's quite inexpensive, and pretty easy to find on-line, so if you're looking for a standard refined office scent, and you're on a budget, you wouldn't go wrong here. I don't find it overly soapy as some of the other more standard fougères, like Lacoste or even Carlo Corinto. A side note: as some reviewers below note, Luca Turin hyperbolically once called this "the worst fougère of all time." But as much as I hugely respect Turin's guide (and I return to it regularly), Turin's opinion on all fragrances is not everyone's, as he himself admits. He loves fragrances that are exceptionally unusual (which this fragrance is not), for example; but then likely he does not have to work in an office with co-workers.

Lavender and powder haters should probably stop reading now. The less well known Duc de Vervins by Houbigant is a beautiful concoction of lavender, powdery notes, moss and some spices. The latter are certainly not overbearing and are blended in quite masterfully with the other notes. But it would be hard to say much more about this scent without comparing it to two others scents: firstly, the venerated and cult classic Brut (yes, Brut!) and the equally comparable Caron Pour Un Homme. The Houbigant comes across as an Eau de Parfum of Brut, with the Caron being an appropriate comparison owing to the similarity of the notes - powerful and aromatic lavender and vanilla on a bed of musk and amber. Those seeking a stronger or longer lasting version of Brut or perhaps just like aromatic, powdery scents with a hint of nostalgia from a bygone era, should look no further than Houbigant Duc de Vervins.

Up close, this fragrance has a certain incense issue, but overall it’s a model barbershop scent. The sweetness and citrus are merely decorative, while the spiciness chases the shaving foam vibe. Despite several sprays on the wrist, it vanished in under an hour. It’s a very delicate scent — an echo of Nobile, a watered-down Nobile. An extreme version is needed; they also went down the route of cloning the original, which doesn’t suit this brand. Bon Monsieur is leagues better — more characterful, long-lasting, and still almost original. Considering both Duc and Duc Extreme, these fragrances represent wasted potential. I’ll check out Lamani Pour Homme and maybe some others, but Rogue seems to be the best so far.

Duc de Vervins .... your search is done If you are a fan of YSL Jazz or polo safari and you are disappointed by the one of them is Discontinued and the other one is just weak performance and synthetic because it’s reformulated. Then your search is done this is all what you are waiting for green fresh classic black and white lemon theme with a nice jazzy feel. It smells green classic lemon with slightly soapy heart and herbal classy moss nothing pungent nothing outdated it’s all nice and green clean. Scent 9.5/10 Projection 8/10 I wish this scent has mint, this is just me because I love mint in classic fragrance Duc de Vervins .... The Maestro

I tested Duc de Vervins on my wrist in Neiman-Marcus today. I had to do a double take at first sniff. Had I accidentally tested Drakkar Noir? No, the bottle is definitely green not black. Wow! When(if) I finish my bottle of Drakkar Noir this is what I'm getting instead. The best way to describe Duc de Vervins is it's Drakkar Noir "Intense". Very, very similar(same) scent but more potent and longer lasting. DdV has a powdery quality(amber?) in drydown that I don't get in DN. More refined. More expensive. Not really similar to Tsar in my opinion. If you like DN you will LOVE this one. It's 100% masculine!

I bought this back in 1998 at Nordstrom when I was only in my 20s. The sexy saleslady in the cosmetics department suggested I buy this one...and me being a sucker listened to her. The smell is nice...but was too mature for me at that time. Now in my 30s...it's a bit more appropriate. DV is definitely a more mature powerhouse fragrance. Should be worn by the 35+ group. Also should be used for night time, formal events, winter, fall, and cold weather.

Compare this with the perfumes of Guy Laroche and Van Cleef & Arpels - not quite correct. It's like comparing mannered aristocrat with stableman)) From the information from the official site that this fragrance is a modern interpretation of the original Fougere Royale ... from which the basic formula is taken. So Drakkar Noir and Tsar - nervously smoking in aside.

I got a sample of this and I have to say, it is in the family of Drakkar Noir but has differences in the dry down. Drakkar in the dry down has more of the Oakmoss. Duc De Vervins in the dry down has more Patchouli/Musk which to me makes it more fresher, and in turn you could wear Duc De Vervins year round vs Drakkar is more a fall/winter wear for me.

I really wanted to fall head over heels for this one, and honestly, I kinda did... for about 20 minutes. And that’s me being generous. We’re talking full on vanishing act by the 10-minute mark straight to skin scent purgatory. Not sure if the extreme version sticks around longer but I Might give it a try

Soapy, clean, herbal and green, it's RL Polo Crest meets Tsar. I like it - it's just my kind of fragrance, although typically, I'd reach for Tsar first. Still, it's a nice alternative to have. For what it's worth, I don't notice the similarity to Drakkar Noir.

Nice, clean fougere. I don't know why it's labeled a "leather" fragrance.

We need to be fair to ourselves as fragrance enthusiasts on where to draw the line between fragrances that illicit joy and those that are nice. Recognizing a fragrance as decent is what helps mark the line between something to appreciate and something we feel compelled to own. For me, this is Duc de Vervins. It's one where I at one time was convinced it was essential to add to one's curated collection. I did not, however, give adequate time toward it—another one to collect dust and languish. I did finally sit with it and gave it quality attention, and decided that, while nicely done (I had a vintage bottle), it felt too much like it was Houbigant's answer to Drakkar Noir (I felt the same way toward Gucci Nobile, from a sample). There are others that, while riding the coattails of the seminal Drakkar Noir, have distinct characteristics that expand upon the trope, like Francesco Smalto and VC&A Tsar. Duc de Vervins is just nice, but I've got this style covered.

I recently had a come to Jesus moment with my collection and realized I had like a dozen bottles that all smelled exactly like Drakkar Noir. One by one I've been dumping them on Mercari and haven't missed a single bottle. Two that are still on the shelf are English Blazer, and the Duc. Sprayed the Duc on today after not wearing it since maybe the summer of 2021, and off the shelf it's going to go. The only difference between this and Drakkar Noir is there is a bit more citrus in the open, and a bit more green in the dry down. It's 100% redundant if you own Drakkar Noir. And I would add it's not worth the price. This should be a sub $30 bottle. Is it good? Absolutely. But it smells nearly identical to Drakkar Noir to justify the space on my shelf.

Seen similarities to many other fragrances I own in previous reviews but for me on opening I get a blast of green - very similar I thought to Salvador Dali pour homme but sharper and not so pleasant. It calms down to a mossy green fragrance with great longevity - no idea where the leather comes in referred to in the Fragrantica title. However, too similar to Salvador Dali for me (for which I have a full bottle), so won’t be getting a full bottle of this although the price is very reasonable. Certainly not your everyday mainstream fragrance.

This is a classic fougère/barbershop fragrance : Oakmoss, rosemary, levender, shaving cream smell just like almost all old style fougère fragrance. Nothing unique, oldschool scent with a horrible longevity (new batches). There are other, cheaper alternatives in the same style (Drakkar noir for example).

The start of this fragrance is not all that pleasant. A very loud brash wash of greens, bergamot, lavender, and oakmoss. I bought this blind, because a number of people I share tastes in common with were giving it a thumbs up, so I took a chance. I was dismayed at first, but recalled how getting to know a fragrance takes time. After an hour, I sniff the back of my hand and the experience is now much better. It doesn't come off like a stuffy bergamot and oakmoss rich 80's fragrance, instead conveying a clean and fresh "green" impression. The sage, nutmeg, and rosemary get a chance to breathe and bring forth a slightly more appealing aroma. This is not a powerhouse fragrance, though. It does share some "chords" with vintage TSAR, but isn't as powerful. It's more approachable and unfortunately more soapy. Yeah, quite soapy indeed. Irish Spring? I haven't used that soap in decades but it came to mind. I have to admit that there is a "cheapness" to this fragrance, and part of what telegraphs this is the gold chromed plastic trim. On the bottom of the bottle, the vacuform mold pips are still there, like that on a cheap Chinese plastic toy. Even the cap feels like it is throw-away. Well, for the fragrance? I couldn't take it. It's too soapy... too "old school" smelling. I appreciate vintage fragrances, not vintage air fresheners. I had to pass on this and take a loss selling it for a good 30% less than what I paid, but I feel better now. And not so happy with this house. They have a legendary name, for their fougere. But this? It's an insult to it. Houbigant. Howbygant. HowbyGod... did they make this?

From 2013: Hey, the Seventies called: they want their aromatic fougeres back! This stuff, in addition to having a pretentious name, is badly dated. Think disco. Yes, it smells like Drakkar Noir. (But I actually like current formulation Drakkar.) In a word, this is obnoxious. Up to this point I thought that, being a 57 year old guy, I'd like just about any fragrance for men from my youth. Wrong. When I was more or less freshly sprayed and walking around like Pepe LePew this morning, a guy plunked himself down in the seat next to me on the Metro. I wanted to turn to him and say, "Do you want to reconsider? You'll be sorry." ----------- Fast forward to 2020. In "Perfumes - The Guide (2018)" Luca Turin writes, "...still unsurpassed in my experience as the worst-ever masculine." Hahahaha!

I agree with Vegas. It's a classic,powerhouse old school scent. A bit too macho for modern men. I am one of these modern men. It's very potent and heavy on oakmoss which is not my friend. It was made in 85 and smells like it. 1985 was a great year as my Bears won the Super Bowl! I can see Singletary rocking this but not me.

This really is similar to the current Drakkar Noir but Duc de Vervins is greener. It's a very simple and subtle fragrance which is a bummer. It's really not worth the price it goes for given its strength and simple nature. I was really expecting more with this one.

It sounds like a spicy fougere. It smells like a rancid mess. This was the only fragrance I had as a teen that I threw away.

This the olfactory equivalent of when Willie Nelson and Snoop Dogg get together - bear with me. It's rich, but it's everyman. It's outlaw, but it's poet. It's a little bit bling, it's a little bit worn leather, white t-shirt too. It's hip hop and country, urban and outdoor, mature yet timeless. It's businessman too - the kind who has seen enough of life to have had issues with his taxes. And, underlying all this is a terpy, autumnal vibe - no-one ever says that this has a cannabis note - but it does have a beautiful terpy, addicting sheen to it. You get a little bit of dry citrus in the opening, and it's slightly vinegary from the off, but this gives way to this piney, shower freshness that dries down to a subtle leather. It doesn't smell like any of these, but if you can appreciate Kouros, Eau Sauvage, Antaeus, Fahrenheit, if you still like Badedas-type smells and your ears perk up at the words 'classic fougere', then the rebellious Duc deserves your time. The scent is spa-bright, uplifting, energising, clean, and, depending on how easy you are with the trigger, brash - but surprisingly subtle in small doses and does attract compliments. It is unapologetically male. It isn't unfair to think of the Duc as the wealthier, better travelled cousin of Brut. He grows on you, and as he is mid-priced and doesn't seem to fit with the rest of Houbigant's line, who knows whether he will be around forever. I wouldn't personally wear the Duc to the office, but great for WFH, self-care days, long drives, running around doing errands, weekends away, nights out with the boys.

Luca Turin's infamous declaration that Duc de Vervins is "...the worst fougère of all time" is difficult to fathom. No explanation of any kind followed that bold statement. On the other hand, Perfume Blogger "Pour Monsieur" disagreed strongly with Turin. User reviews swing wildly from high praise to outright disdain. All those strongly conflicting opinions left me not knowing what to think. Now, having worn the fragrance for several weeks, I think Duc de Vervins smells like a fresher, drier, less sweet version of Van Cleef & Arpels' Tsar—green, bitter and herbal. Drakkar Noir also comes to mind. The citrusy-green opening might be a bit sharp and bright for some, but once it settles down, I find Duc de Vervins to be a quiet and subtle scent. Fresh, but not loud. The truth is, Duc de Vervins turns out to be surprisingly refined. Yes, quite nice. I can't imagine what Mr. Turin was thinking.

Really green, really strong and really really heavy. Kind of a cross between the original green Polo and Brut and a touch of Tsar. Very strong sharp herbal and woody notes with a noticeable metallic underlining. It does have an expensive well crafted air about it and maybe an older gentleman who is a banker in a three piece suit behind a marble desk could pull this off. I certainly cannot. I could not imagine anyone using this on a regular basis. I remember selling this at Neiman Marcus in the 90's and at the time it was the most expensive bottle of men's cologne we sold. A 4.2 oz spray went for $160 I think. Now it can be found on line in the $40-$50 dollar range. Maybe a good value, but I would not recommend anyone buying this blind, you should know what you are getting into with this one.

Man oh man, ain't this the man! Houbigant's Duc de Vervins is macho all the way, as in - loud and proud, we are heading back to the 80's! Strong as bull. And yes, it does appear to have Drakkar Noir in its DNA. Out of the gate it's fresh and remains so and so and so. A solid mix of citrus, wood and some spice. Never have taken to lavender but here it is kept in check. Smells solid in that mano y mano way. Not clear this is a purchase for yours truly but I will give it my endorsement. Probably best for Wall Street types and that upper crust country club player. Sillage and longevity are great. Keeps giving when others have gone home to rest. The packaging/ bottle are class.. Royalty all the way. Best, the price is in line with the new world order. Based on three samples over three months.

My wife accidentally broke my 4.2 ounce of Gucci nobile a couple days ago !! I barley used it because of the price hike after it got discontinued. While I love the smell I was never in the mood to wear it, the room smelled amazing so I knew I had to replace it. More for nostalgia it was the first cologne I ever owned. My dad bought it for me at 14 for Christmas. So Before dropping 500$+ I decided to try this and glad i did. This is almost identical to my nose so I was able to replace it with the same effect at a fraction of the price. I also bought the extreme, I like it this version better it seems to project more and smells closer to Gucci nobile. Gucci nobile was more complex with the added notes but this is good enough. I would say it’s like a edt and nobile was the edp

The opening smells exactly like Taxi (I have Taxi on one wrist and DV on the other). After a few minutes I pick up more bergamot, whereas in Taxi after a few minutes I pick up more dry, herbal lavender. As time passes, DV resembles Caesars Man before drying down to a clean soapiness that reminds me of the drydown of Drakkar Noir. It projects pretty well at the beginning, but I find that it quiets down quickly. On me it becomes a skin scent after about hour six. Importantly, it develops and smells much better on skin than on clothes. Of all those that followed in DN's footsteps, I like this one the best. Nevertheless, Drakkar has something truly magical that no others come close to achieving.

Can someone explain the difference between this one and the extreme? I’m new to the perfume world and I am absolutely fascinated. I never knew it could go so deep! My first turn on to some good quality stuff was Gucci Nobile. I was so obsessed with it I did some research and found out about the different notes and how to compare colognes and found this and immediately bought 2 bottles. I’m halfway through the second and I found out about the extreme version. I’d like to know who could tell me what compares and others I might like to sample. Thanks to an awesome community.

I stumbled upon a large batch of old school men's fragrances and Houbigant Duc de Vervins may have been my favorite of the whole lot. This is the aromatic of dreams. Sage, lavender, oakmoss, rosemary. This is the smell of a Simon & Garfunkel lullaby. It's definitely not a leather fragrance, but it does give the impression of expensive clothing, a well cut jacket, maybe with leather patches on the elbows. Argyle socks. A man who does not watch television and his musical taste scares you slightly. I wish my father had worn this one when I was growing up.

Like many have said this is a niche version of Drakkar. Idk if the reviews here are for vintage bottles but this is most certainly not a powerhouse. My skin holds fragrance real well but this is gone within 3 hours. A damn shame because it's an amazing 3 hours. I wouldn't purchase again. Update. Maybe it's my imagination or the bottle just needed a little time but this seems to be picking up some steam. My original post was from a first wear out of a brand new bottle. Was going to give it away. Glad I didn't

I just received a new bottle of Duc today, the extreme version instead of the original. When I got my first bottle back in the 90’s, many of the women at work could not get enough of the smell. I can assure you that it was the fragrance, not me. A couple of them bought bottles for themselves even though they considered it a very masculine scent. They didn’t wear it out on dates; they just kept it at home or in their work lockers to spray on their own wrists, just to be able to smell it through the day.

Not similar to Drakkar Noir IMO -- drakkar is soapier and mintier, with more shave foam. This (a vintage 80s sample I tried) is more of a green citrus herbal aromatic fougere with oakmoss & patchouli. Smells classy and masculine, very hard to pin the exact vibe. I'd say if you like classic old-school scents pre 1995, you might like this. If you don't this isn't for you. It is mature, 30+. Great work scent. Overall rating 7/10.