Glam

@Cheriebeary - I COMPLETELY agree!! If there were another fragrance that smelled almost identical to this but had the name of a respected fragrance house on it...I know the "love" bar above would have ALOT more votes and the "disilke" bar would have a lot less votes. But unfortunately that's just the immature society that we live in. ANYWAY...back to my honestt review. I think this fragrance smells very nice! It is deff a fragrance for warmer weather, Id say its perfect for spring and early fall when it isnt freezing out, nor is it scorching outside. It's very fresh, very very refreshing actually. And the longevity isnt bad on me. I only paid $22 for the big bottle and it lasts about 5 hours on me with VERY good projection. It projects about 5 feet on me. If you can be mature and objective enough to ignore the face advertising the fragrance, you can appreciate it. It smells very nice, it is not too heavy or too sweet (i'm SICK of sickly sticky sweet celebrity sugar bombs,) and this is definitely not that. It certainly isnt as unique & certainly does not have the depth or character of True Reflection or Pure Honey, but this perfume gets the job done with ease when you want to smell fresh and clean. Almost a hint of very clean, fresh soap smell to it. I personally smell the middle notes MUCH more dominantly than the top notes. I smell the watermelon and citruses slightly, but I smell the jasmine and tuberose MUCH more. Longevity : 7.5/10 Fragrance Itself : 8.5/10 Projection : 8.5/10 Overall rating : 8 - Give this one a try guys. $23 on amazon for a 3.4 oz bottle...you can't go wrong! Nicely done Kim!

My first Kim Kardashian fragrance was with her first perfume, and although I loved the luxurious and heady scent, it gave me headaches, so I never bought a bottle of my own. Next was Pure Honey, which was way nicer and softer than I expected from her, especially considering the first fragrance was so strong and rich. I blind bought and was quite happy with my purchase. Now I have tried Glam, and I'm in serious love. I wasn't paying attention to the way the sprayer was facing and instead of spraying a testing card, I sprayed my hair. Then I figured I might as well spray my wrist. Initially I got a syrupy sweet fruit blast, but it faded almost immediately to a light, airy, dancing scent of shampoo or soap. Except I've never smelled shampoo or soap that is so crisp or natural. Although this fragrance is called Glam, and although the notes say to me that the fragrance would be heavy and decadent, I get pictures of long windblown hair, a denim jacket, floral print shirts...simple, classic, you-but-prettier vibe. The longevity is a problem for sure, but if I put my nose to my wrist, the drydown is even pretty as it fades away like a sunset. I get more of the tuberose and rose in the softest amounts, and the sandalwood is used in a quieter, more graceful way than I'm used to. I feel like this should have been called something other than Glam...something more ethereal and twinkling. The fragrance doesn't match the idea at all. I'm not complaining because I don't care what it's called for how much this suits me, but I'm surprised a better name wasn't suggested. I need this fragrance now.

To be honest, out of Kim's collection (Minus her newest Fleur Fatale), this is probably my least favorite. For me it is not because it is a bad perfume at all, I just feel like it is the least unique scent of her collection. My favorite scent is her original signature fragrance. This one to me smells like a fresh, clean, crisp tuberose scent with a little bit of fruit. People who are looking for something extraordinary are not going to be happy, because this is a simple scent. People who are also Kim K haters are more than likely to say negative things about this one and any other in Kim's collection, so that is why I had to own a bottle myself. I do think that the BOTTLE is gorgeous and the best of her circular bottle collection. The pink is a pretty shade and I like the fake diamond cap. It truly is "Glam" and is pretty to look at! I am happy with this one, and I do recommend it. :)

I agree with BluDreamer780 as he or she has described these fragrances the way I was trying to. I disagree that Kim should stop doing the tuberose thing. Stella always does roses just a slight variation in each addition so I don't personally see a problem with Kim doing it. I love tuberose I enjoyed her first perfume and I have enjoyed trying each one to see the differences. I purchased the little set of all her perfumes and I love each one on my skin and they are small enough for travelling which is important to me. I can see the variation in each one with Gold being the most different. After purchasing Glam I still think it dries down similar not the same but similar to Jennifer Anniston's perfume which I also love.

Glam is the first of her perfumes I have bought thats in the round bottle. Idk how I feel about her signature yet. But I have to say I do love this one. It works very well with my skin chemistry with the white floral scent. This perfume has began to make me look at white floral totally different now. I love the pink bottle to start off with. It's very classy and pretty. The smell itself is kinda loud at first one me. A kinda of light floral fruity smell. Lovely and it stays true to itself throughout the down dry. It last about 5 hours on me and that's a plus. And the sillage is awesome. Already got a compliment the first time I wore it . in my opinion this is a whole year type scent. I give Kim a 10/10 on this one!!