Glam

@Cheriebeary - I COMPLETELY agree!! If there were another fragrance that smelled almost identical to this but had the name of a respected fragrance house on it...I know the "love" bar above would have ALOT more votes and the "disilke" bar would have a lot less votes. But unfortunately that's just the immature society that we live in. ANYWAY...back to my honestt review. I think this fragrance smells very nice! It is deff a fragrance for warmer weather, Id say its perfect for spring and early fall when it isnt freezing out, nor is it scorching outside. It's very fresh, very very refreshing actually. And the longevity isnt bad on me. I only paid $22 for the big bottle and it lasts about 5 hours on me with VERY good projection. It projects about 5 feet on me. If you can be mature and objective enough to ignore the face advertising the fragrance, you can appreciate it. It smells very nice, it is not too heavy or too sweet (i'm SICK of sickly sticky sweet celebrity sugar bombs,) and this is definitely not that. It certainly isnt as unique & certainly does not have the depth or character of True Reflection or Pure Honey, but this perfume gets the job done with ease when you want to smell fresh and clean. Almost a hint of very clean, fresh soap smell to it. I personally smell the middle notes MUCH more dominantly than the top notes. I smell the watermelon and citruses slightly, but I smell the jasmine and tuberose MUCH more. Longevity : 7.5/10 Fragrance Itself : 8.5/10 Projection : 8.5/10 Overall rating : 8 - Give this one a try guys. $23 on amazon for a 3.4 oz bottle...you can't go wrong! Nicely done Kim!

My first Kim Kardashian fragrance was with her first perfume, and although I loved the luxurious and heady scent, it gave me headaches, so I never bought a bottle of my own. Next was Pure Honey, which was way nicer and softer than I expected from her, especially considering the first fragrance was so strong and rich. I blind bought and was quite happy with my purchase. Now I have tried Glam, and I'm in serious love. I wasn't paying attention to the way the sprayer was facing and instead of spraying a testing card, I sprayed my hair. Then I figured I might as well spray my wrist. Initially I got a syrupy sweet fruit blast, but it faded almost immediately to a light, airy, dancing scent of shampoo or soap. Except I've never smelled shampoo or soap that is so crisp or natural. Although this fragrance is called Glam, and although the notes say to me that the fragrance would be heavy and decadent, I get pictures of long windblown hair, a denim jacket, floral print shirts...simple, classic, you-but-prettier vibe. The longevity is a problem for sure, but if I put my nose to my wrist, the drydown is even pretty as it fades away like a sunset. I get more of the tuberose and rose in the softest amounts, and the sandalwood is used in a quieter, more graceful way than I'm used to. I feel like this should have been called something other than Glam...something more ethereal and twinkling. The fragrance doesn't match the idea at all. I'm not complaining because I don't care what it's called for how much this suits me, but I'm surprised a better name wasn't suggested. I need this fragrance now.

To be honest, out of Kim's collection (Minus her newest Fleur Fatale), this is probably my least favorite. For me it is not because it is a bad perfume at all, I just feel like it is the least unique scent of her collection. My favorite scent is her original signature fragrance. This one to me smells like a fresh, clean, crisp tuberose scent with a little bit of fruit. People who are looking for something extraordinary are not going to be happy, because this is a simple scent. People who are also Kim K haters are more than likely to say negative things about this one and any other in Kim's collection, so that is why I had to own a bottle myself. I do think that the BOTTLE is gorgeous and the best of her circular bottle collection. The pink is a pretty shade and I like the fake diamond cap. It truly is "Glam" and is pretty to look at! I am happy with this one, and I do recommend it. :)

I agree with BluDreamer780 as he or she has described these fragrances the way I was trying to. I disagree that Kim should stop doing the tuberose thing. Stella always does roses just a slight variation in each addition so I don't personally see a problem with Kim doing it. I love tuberose I enjoyed her first perfume and I have enjoyed trying each one to see the differences. I purchased the little set of all her perfumes and I love each one on my skin and they are small enough for travelling which is important to me. I can see the variation in each one with Gold being the most different. After purchasing Glam I still think it dries down similar not the same but similar to Jennifer Anniston's perfume which I also love.

Glam is the first of her perfumes I have bought thats in the round bottle. Idk how I feel about her signature yet. But I have to say I do love this one. It works very well with my skin chemistry with the white floral scent. This perfume has began to make me look at white floral totally different now. I love the pink bottle to start off with. It's very classy and pretty. The smell itself is kinda loud at first one me. A kinda of light floral fruity smell. Lovely and it stays true to itself throughout the down dry. It last about 5 hours on me and that's a plus. And the sillage is awesome. Already got a compliment the first time I wore it . in my opinion this is a whole year type scent. I give Kim a 10/10 on this one!!

This is just beautiful! I have to admit I first smelt this years ago and didn't think much of it. I have really started enjoying floral fragrances as I'm tiring of the sweet perfumes I used to enjoy. Wow I tried this again and honestly I'm really appreciating the beautiful composition. Lovely soft tuberose and jasmine with the slight sweetness coming from the watermelon I'm thinking. It almost has a wet flower petals feel to it like rain. I know that sounds odd but it's like smelling soft flowers in a rainstorm to me brings me back memories as a child during a thunderstorm out in the garden. I love this! Highly recommended and will definitely keep purchasing this underrated gem...

I bought this last night @ Kohls!!! I was so impressed by my sampling that I immediately purchased a 1oz bottle (only size available there)...As the fragrance developed things got even better... I remember there being talk of a lack of development of her 1st fragrance which I agreed with 2 a degree. This beauty definitely has an opening with watermelon n berries, a middle with light florals and a warm sultry closing... Its smells ultra feminine and luxurious and the tuberose isn't screaming here but rather wispering lol :) Moderate projection will get it noticed but not offend as in KK Gold... I got about 4 hrs of wear from this b4 it wore very close 2 he skin :)

This is a very light floral with just a touch of fruit. On my skin it starts as a jasmine/tuberose blend and after a few moments the slightest hint of berries appears, and then the drydown becomes this lovely subtle powdery floral, with just a hint of musk. This is a very demure classy scent.It is most appropriate for young ladies, or older ladies who don't want to reek of those old lady, heady perfumes. It is a delightful scent, perfect for spring and summer, and daytime dates, or even work.

The initial blast smelled horrible on me - like a cleaning agent (or as one other person commented, furniture polish). However that quickly gave way to a most delightful scent - clean & soapy; it reminds me of an old Avon perfume: MARK PURE. I enjoyed it for all of about an hour and then it was gone but after a few hours I'm catching the faintest hint of fruit fragrance. I got the 3.4 oz bottle for a great price and will enjoy using it up but won't repurchase.

This perfume smells amazing so I don't understand the bad reviews. The only negative is that it does not last, but it smells great. I smell flowers (tuberose mostly).. .but in a very delicate way. Certainly not an overwhelming flower smell like her first perfume. I received compliments on it but had to reapply all day...got the cream version of this perfume to see if I could make it last longer because I truly do love it

Early spring brings out the notes in Glam. Its perfect for spring. Layered with Fracas is jyst dreamy! Mmmmm this is so yummy when craving tuberose and a dewy refreshing sweetness. I didn't like it at first. Years later i tried it again and this time was the right time cuz now ive discovered this gem of a fragrance. Go Kim go! Girl, you keep making all the ones im craving! I see your talent😍

I love this fragrance! I find it to be a gorgeous creamy floral scent. It opens ad a combination light fruity floral, then as it settles on the skin and the scent wafts up around my nose i smell a beautiful creamy soft scent. Im not sute which note gives it the creaminess but whatever it is it works for me and maked this one a winner.

I like this one a lot better than the original (even though i liked that one as well), it seems sweeter, fuller, more complex. Some of the reviewers below say that it smells Exactly the same, i completely disagree, you shouldn't judge a scent just from trying it one time at the mall or from a strip in a magazine.

This smells really good! Clean, fruity and juicy. I can pick out the watermelon and berries. It is more fruity than floral in my opinion, which is nice since her other ones have alot of tuberose in them. Cute bottle too. I would not mind having a bottle of this.

nothing wrong with this one !! is perfect for day time! clean fresh , sexy . one of my favorite celebrity one! no so sweet,not loud , clean, calm perfume!! I love every tipe of perfume , the only one I like from kim ,, winner!!

It is a nice summer scent! I think people should stop judging her and actually give some of her perfumes a try. I mostly smell Tuberose and hints of berries. It is a fun scent to wear.I really like this one very much!

A nice combination is Kim K Glam over Issey Miyake Rose and Rose. Very sexy alluring scent. And by the way early spring both those fragrances I mentioned are at their best in my opinion.

I cannot believe it, that so many do not like this one. I really think it is fresh, sensual and all together a great perfume!

Smells AMAZING. But lasts maybe 2 hours

Smells stunning.A lovely floral scent.

I bought a small 1oz bottle on eBay for under $10, unsure of what to expect, although I have been on a blind buy streak and every one as been a success (thankfully!). I really like this. It’s comforting to me. It’s very gentle and reminds me alot of a fabric softener I really like but never buy cause it’s expensive. I think this will be a great scent for work, or a doctor’s appointment, that kind of thing. It smells comforting and inviting to me. I’m really happy with it! I can’t pick out any specific note honestly. I’ll probably move on to a bigger bottle once this one is gone though. It’s a nice, pleasant scent that I am sure anyone around you will enjoy. It’s definitely note niche or anything, but it stands well on its own I think. The bottle is also really cute. I have yet to wear this and test its projection and longevity but I imagine projection will be somewhere between intimate and moderate. It’s not a loud scent by any means. I don’t really have any opinions about the kardashians but I have fallen in love with nearly every fragrance from Kim and the KKW brand. I’m still waiting for KKW to come back so I can get my hands on one of my favorite smells of all time (the blue Sapphire Diamond one. I wear that one really well and have never been complimented on my fragrance so much as when I wear it!). Anyways, hopefully my scrambled review helps the next person considering blind buying this. I have adhd so I can ramble and veer off topic sometimes. Overall, I do think this is a safe blind buy, and it’s very inexpensive as well.

I really don't get the hate and negative reviews. Please base your review on the scent and not the celebrity. I happen to like Kim and all the Kardashians. The perfume: I bought the set of 4 minis from Kohls, because I wanted to try all her perfumes. I figured based on the weather here in upstate NY today, I would try Glam first. I find the scent more of a clean/floral/soapy scent, which I love on more humid days. I actually think this one resembles Jlo Glow a lot, which I use to own and use every day in the summer. I feel Glam is a little more subtle. I will have to update on the longevity, since I literally just took my shower and put this on, so it's only been about 10 minutes. So far I smell it on me, with fan blowing in the house I am getting strong whiffs of the scent, and I love that! I hate when I put on a scent and don't smell it 5 minutes later. Will keep you posted and do an update tonight on it.

As I look at the reviews on this scent, I can see its either a love or hate fragrance. However, I sincerely believe that ones chemistry has a lot to do with how the nose interprets what is sprayed on one's skin. That being said, I like "Glam" It isn't my signature but on my skin I got that blast of citrus and the aqueous fresh nature of the watermelon - the musk and sandalwood base notes aren't in any way overpowering and there is a sweetness and that mentholated (heady) quality of the tuberose. On my fifteen-year-old sister however, this scent was super chic plummy and gorgeous so I don't get the references to "Glam" smelling old! It isn't what people expect a glam perfume to be - you know this musky heavy scent- its a totally different interpretation of glamour and one I like. A well composed fragrance from KK. Way to go Kim and co!

Glam is cool! If you're in the mood for red berries, musk, and white flowers, sort of jammy but light--this is a good pick for you. It is not going to 'wow' you, but it has a youthful vibe to it that is refreshing. My nose does not pick up much citrus--instead, it created a strong gardenia note in the opening. Gardenia is not mentioned in the notes above, but my nose insists on it. There is also a soapy element in the dry down that is very pleasant. This is appropriate for many daily uses, all seasons. It has moderate projection and longevity--so don't be shy to re-apply. I believe this is a safe blind buy for all ages. September 11, 2023--This is my second time wearing Glam, and I am really enjoying the powdery dry down that this has. Glam creates a lovely scent bubble that is very pleasant, but not overwhelming.

Despite not wanting to support the celebrity behind the perfume, my fragrance addiction and love of white florals took hold of me and I bought it. White musk is present all through from the top to the base of the composition. It is a clean, laundry detergent kind of musk, even more so than soap. In the beginning this musk transiently couples with citruses, but they soon divorce and a loud, voluptuous tuberose takes its place (😉😉). It is bordering on obnoxious & vulgar (wink, wink). At first the tuberose has green nuances then it turns sweeter and bubble-gummy, possibly from the effect of the red berries. The musk-tuberose combo forms the great majority of the perfume life. It doesn’t undergo much development (superficial 😉😉). All insinuations aside the scent is a wearable, white floral and quite cheap (😂).

Blind bought this one, just got it and this is exactly how I imagined it would smell like. It's the lighter and fresher version of the original (but not citrusy and aquatic!). Definitely smell the white flowers, mostly Tuberose, but is not as creamy, dense and rich as it is in her original fragrance. This could be the "Eau Fraîche" version. I would keep the original as an evening and winter scent and this one as an office, daytime, spring-summer scent. Very feminine, sensual, delicate, warm, optimistic and natural fragrance. Also office friendly and most important - this doesn't smell cheap at all considering the pricepoint (15$ for a 100 ml brand new bottle). The longevity on my clothes (sleeve) (didn't try it on skin)- 6 hours and still counting. Projection - medium to intimate.

The bottle feels and looks rather cheap. I bought it for under $6 so I wasn't really expecting quality. I was just curious about the scent based on the notes and Fragantica member's reviews. Well, its rather nice actually. To me, it was a pleasant medly of sweet (not tarty) berries with a soft tuberose note, and a faint muskies. I didn't notice any watermelon. The performance was disappointing, but expected. I was just hoping for bodyspray performance at the very least. It was 100% gone in less than an hour on my wrist. Nothing. Zero. Zilch. Not even a trace. I guess it'll work fine as a throw in your gym bag kind of thing. Not strong, none offensive, and it'll be gone by the time you get home and shower from the gym.

I purchased Kim Kardashian 'Koffret Kollection' which includes this one, the original, Love and Gold. Kim Kardashian Glam is a gorgeous spring/summer perfume! It is really clean, light, feminine and floral. I like to spray this straight after I've had a shower, it has a really nice 'soapy' vibe about it. I certainly do not think this smells in anyway cheap! I think it smells expensive! Glam lasts about 3-4 hours and has good sillage, it is the lightest of her 'Koffret Kollection' Overall, a very underrated fragrance that is clean, feminine, floral with light fruits. I am starting to love this one. Highly recommended! Kim has a fantastic perfume range!

A really nice, young and modern white floral! I always expect both new and vintage white florals to smell dated and heavy but I was wrong once again. The flowers are soft and fresh and the fruits adds a juicy sweetness. The huge dislikebar for this is ridiculous... Might turn into a love even if it performs below average. At least it is stronger than a skinscent for about 30 minutes. More floral and less sweet than Radiance but they still are pretty similar.

This is not a bad scent at all, it just smells more like a body soap than a perfume. I think the name is rather misleading because I couldn't see myself wearing this to a party or formal event. This is more of a clean, cozy scent that I can imagine wearing after a bath. Still, I don't think it deserves so much hate. It's just a clean, soapy, floral and musky scent. I don't love it, but I don't dislike it either.

I don ́t quite know what to say. I don ́t love it and I don ́t hate it. I smell tuberose, mostly and it kinda makes me think of fabric softener. Im a girl who loves pink, so I just had to have it. I bought 30 ml just in case I didn ́t like it. Im a bit disappointed that the spray-thing is made of plastic, it makes the bottle look cheap. Come on Kim K, you can do better than that.

Bright and fresh in that neroli kind of way, but with the tuberose shining out like a little crystal bell. To me the packaging should be icy blue or palest green, not warm pink. It's cheery and fresh in cool humid spring weather, haven't tried it in other seasons. Feels like it would be very refreshing and uplifting on a hot day. It's worth the 6 pound blind buy.

I smelled it today at Icing. It smells like some tuberose with a punch of watermelon. It is not really my type, but the bottle is cute and I like the pictures of Kim in the dress on the box, they sorta look like the dress Katy Perry wore in the choice awards one year.

A tuberose based scent that's been sweetened up just a bit with fruity hints. I smell a bit of the jasmine here too but the tuberose is the most prevalent. This is not a heavy dark buttery tuberose, its more lighthearted and wearable for day.

I really like fruity floral scents and this is a very good combination. I don't think it's as overpowering as her other scents. I can really smell the jasmine and rose on the dry down and the simplicity of the two is nice.

a very pretty modern floral without going all fruity; tuberose, jasmine, rose, musk; it goes on almost aquatic and dries down to remind me of an inexpensive wild orchid fragrance that I had when I was young

I don't know why I feel a lot of gardenia in this perfume. Glam is very nice, kinda of mature, and slightly sweet. I've received compliments on this, from an specific type of man, and it's interesting.

Gorgeous, inexpensive white flower perfume. Fades quickly, and sits close to the skin, but for a short night out in the summer this is great.

A very musky and flowery scent. I thought it was neroli in it. That was wrong. Recommend it for day use. What else... Hmm.. Yep a 3.

So yummy and cute! Love it! It has latest on my skin for a while now! Can't wait to get a bottle xx

This is basically a lighter version of Kim's original debut fragrance.

Smells very fresh and clean, doesnt last long though

I tend to like the not-so-beloved celebrity fragrances, so I gave this one a shot.......it's tuberose scented laundry detergent. Cold and weirdly dense while also very fleeting. I don't hate it, but it needs help. I know nobody else is likely going to want this, so by golly I'm going to make it work! Now, I'm not much into layering, but I tried this with the Cloud Musk from Mix:Bar (Target) and it's actually a pretty good combo! A definite improvement. It gives Glam some warmth and tones down the detergent. My first layering experiment and it wasn't a total fail! Though, I might try it with an actual simple white musk. Cloud Musk isn't exactly that. *No no no. Nevermind, that Cloud Musk is getting strange and funky. Will keep trying... *Naah. I'm done trying to layer. I don't have the patience! I've come to appreciate this fragrance on it's own. It's a little quirky. It's cool!

This is a modern take on vintage perfumes. The opening is soapy tuberose and oakmoss and drydown has an added fruity note...it's definitely a glamorous, formal type of scent. Very unusual for a celebrity scent.

At it's core GLAM is basically the same as Kim's self named debut perfume; it is a floral jumble and the only individual floral note strong enough to stand out individually is the tuberose. The bitter floral jumble is so powerful on me that it hides almost everything else that the perfume has to offer. There is very little difference between the top, heart and base; There was a short lived burst of lemon in the opening, then a laundry detergent undertone to the floral notes develops quite quickly, and finally the musk note develops and joins in the free-for-all. Laundry detergent? I'm not sure what it is, maybe the water melon combined with clean floral notes, such as orange flower, lily or neroli. The individual notes are too closely mixed together to separate and the soapy mix hides the berries, orris and wood notes, so GLAM is rather cold. I don't have anything against Kim Kardashian herself. If you just don't like this fragrance or any other particular celebrity fragrance, style or preferred makeup look why are you instantly labelled as a bitchy, jealous 'hater' or snob?

On me GLAM is basically the same as Kim's self named debut perfume; it is a floral jumble and the only individual floral note strong enough to stand out individually is the tuberose. The bitter floral jumble is so powerful that it hides almost everything else that the perfume has to offer. The fragrance is largly one dimensional, offering very little difference between the top, heart and base; There was a short lived burst of lemon in the opening, then a laundry detergent undertone develops quite quickly, and finally the musk note develops and joins in the mess. Laundry detergent? I'm not sure what it is, maybe the water melon combined with the citrus & clean floral notes, such as orange flower, lily or neroli. The individual notes are too closely mixed together to separate and the soapy mix hides the berries, orris and wood notes, so GLAM is rather cold to me. Considering that GLAM applies strongly, the poor longevity surprised me. It averages between four and five hours,which, considering the impressive longevity of both Kim Kardashian and Gold, is poor.

This perfume is very underwhelming, which is surprising since it's so loud. I'm an avid perfume collector, so I can't say I had "high hopes" for just another celebrity perfume. Consequently, I'm not left "disappointed," as I bought the whole gift set on sale for $10 at CVS. It's not terrible if you like a more spicy scent, particularly with a fruity twist. It smells very cheap, but I guess you get what you pay for. The overpowering cherry scent is most likely what is turning my nose off. Again, if you like those sorts of high, border-line stripper smelling notes, then this is the perfume for you. The smell is also VERY lasting, making it yet another pain for anyone who tries blind buying it and ends up not liking it. I find Kim K a very beautiful person, but I wish the scent and advertising here didn't come across so offensive to the senses. I feel she could have done a much more thoughtful job with this one. I honestly feel uncomfortable even gifting it to anyone because of the lack of class.

Put this on at Khols then went to pick up my car at the car fixer place and the man at the counter said I smell great. He asked what it was and I said KK he then said he didn't like it anymore. Idk why it matters who makes it as long as it smells nice ill buy it. Well correction, I wouldn't buy anything from Michael Vick. I do wish it lasted longer but I swear my skin soaks smells into fast or something cause nothing seems to last on me:( except Angel.

I bought this on impulse, and now I slightly regret it. I had a quick sniff at the store, and I was taken in by the tuberose and jasmine. When I tried it on at home, I realised I'd smelt the dry down before. It smelled exactly like a laundry powder I used to use. I'd also like to add that the bottle is super tacky. Plastic rhinestones, glitter and an awful white plastic pump are definitely not glamorous.

To be honest, I really don't like this perfume. It's incredibly soapy, unlike Kim Kardashian's original fragrance in the black bottle, which I adore. I had high hopes for this one, but it's a total disappointment. After reading reviews, it seems like I'm not the only one feeling this way. It's like a heavily soaped-up version of her original perfume, which just doesn't work for me.