Lomani pour Homme

Let me start this review by saying that, even when I purchased this, I had no idea what I was getting into. All I knew at the time was I had a $7 off $30 coupon at the CVS where I got this, and Boucheron Quatre was on clearance for $16.49, and both Lomani pour Homme and White Intense were both $7.99. This gave me the dollar amount I needed to use that coupon (and another $5 one) to bring the total for all three down to just over $20. Not too bad, even if all they turned out to be were bathroom sprays. I opened the Boucheron first, and you can see my review on that on its page. Lomani White Intense was next to be opened and I guess it was so unmemorable; I didn't even bother writing anything on it. Today, I opened Lomani Pour Homme. Let me be clear, after I purchased this, is when I discovered Drakkar Noir, and opened it prior to Lomani, thus discovering how much I enjoyed it. Upon seeing its similarity to Lomani, I anxiously awaited the day I opened it to see how it compared. Well, today was that day, and boy was it close. I sprayed both on, one spritz on each arm. It's safe to say you can instantly smell the similarities (and differences). The Lomani seems to take the sharpest notes from Drakkar to make the opening pop, whereas Drakkar keeps going with mint to cool and basil for some subtle sweetness. As it begins to dry down, the differences slowly start to disappear. However, while both project about the same, Drakkar seems to have a slight edge on longevity. Something is always lost in translation, and sometimes it's glaringly apparent, while other times it isn't. Lomani managed to create a 7/8ths version of Drakkar for about half the price. Only if they're side by side can you really spot the differences. One thing both of these did equally well was introduce me to two 80's "barbershop" fragrances I love. Previous attempts have failed miserably, or maybe, they didn't. Maybe tastes evolve. Maybe if I went back and smelled what once didn't appeal to me (I'm looking at you, Paco Rabanne), I'd have a different opinion today when I just turned 40, than I did 8 years ago when I wore it barely into my 30's. Or maybe, the newer ones just do it better than others before them. Looking at all these fragrance pages, one thing that's a rather funny coincidence, though, is at the time I am writing this, Lomani Pour Homme, Drakkar Noir, and Paco Rabanne Pour Homme, all have the same exact rating (3.98). Maybe we really don't know what we are smelling. Maybe the differences are so negligible, it doesn't really matter. As long as you love wearing it, who cares? 9/10

This is not a dupe of Drakkar. If you want a dupe of Drakkar, buy Al-Rehab Dakar, which you can get for $7 on Amazon, lasts longer and smells like the vintage stuff. I love that stuff, with all of its sharp, bitter notes and macho 80's swagger. Lomani, however, is a different animal. Much brighter top, much lighter and smoother overall. This is the "Night at the Symphony" to Drakkar's "Night at the Swinger's Club circa 1986". The comparison to Caesar's Man is much closer, and unless you can get vintage Caesar's, this destroys the new stuff in longevity. Having said this, if you are the kind of person who has 10 or fewer fragrances and you already have Drakkar/Dakar, you may not need this, as either of those will check the "fougere" category box. But if you are like me, for whom fougeres are a favorite category, this is a worthy addition, especially for $10. I have tried and loved many fougeres, and have given away or sold many others, but this one is a keeper. It is on the gentle, aromatic side of fougeres, semi-barbershop, a bit more modern smelling than Paco Rabanne or Azzaro; better than Perry Ellis Portfolio Elite or Dunhill X-Centric. Still masculine, but classier. There are also several notes here that I smelled that are not listed. Turns out that other websites list some of those, including tangerine, coriander (lemony-herbal), juniper (which plays a major role in keeping this "fresh" and giving a pine accord), and a clean vetiver. We are all creatures open to influence, but most reviews below didn't pick up on any of these, and these are the very notes, plus a muted kind of incense and woods notes in the drydown, that distinguish it from DN. This would have been considered quite "modern" when it was introduced, lacking the classic carnation, easier on the clove, with increased woods and vetiver. Fougere lovers should just buy this - you will have no regrets

I agree with the reviewers below- this fragrance is so underrated. Yes presentation is poor and not so appealing, which I believe is why so many people will not consider it purchase worthy. Yet the scent itself and the price can quickly change any customer's mind. Yes there are similarities with Drakkar Noir, but they are not the same. Suitable for any season, and any part of the day, inoffensive and very pleasant. This is the only fragrance I own that last longer on skin than on my clothes. I could describe it as cheeky because on my clothes the staying power is about 2-3 hours, but on my skin it lasts all day. There were many occasions that I thought it is gone but with any physical activity, is surprisingly back, creating a pleasing aura or a scent bubble that was lingering around me 7-8 hours after application. If we take the scent and place it into a Versace, D&G or other big fashion brand name bottle, it will sell for $50 to $60 AUD easily and be named a masterpiece..... I have to admit, this is my most reached out frag and is so easy to wear. The lady at my local chemist broke my heart as she told me I am not the only customer who buys 5-6 bottles at once, and there are other crazy hoarders thinking its a shower gel ;) he he. Just go get one it is great

I love this fragrance, light and a great casual wear. It’s masculine and does indeed have that spicy soap profile of Drakkar. Key here being it is more in line with an aftershave, much more airy on application with the dry down being a skin scent. The description of old shaving memories is well suited, a classic barbershop kind of profile. I am not really sure how it has come to the point where scent profiles don’t get appreciated. Labels like cheap, old man are odd, considering how expensive scents can be easily just as offensive as the cheap ones. For eight bucks Canadian, I am pretty much thrilled by this scent, and the presentation is surprisingly good, lots of detail even in the box. The spray nozzle isn’t even crap compared to what you get from other brands, even Drakkar pales compared to this “inspired” take. I enjoy wearing older scent profiles, I find them quite nostalgic and enjoyable in the world of Maple Bacon Musk profiles. If you like a classic shaving routine, grand dads safety razor, then for Father’s Day grab yourself a bottle of this and enjoy an inexpensive trip with our male role models of the past.

This is a real unsung hero in older style mens scents. It's fresh, masculine and reassuringly recognisable. Lavender, citruses, florals with aromatics and a gentle spiciness, absolutely nothing here to complain about at all. On top of that, I picked it up for about £10 GBP, Mental! It doesn't feel dated but I'm a guy just into middle age. Lol 😆. It just feels timeless and like a clean, well kept man. Solid performance, surprisingly so given the pittance paid. Sillage and longevity are decent, performing on par with plenty of today's offerings that are apparently EDPs and more. Even if you do feel it's a little underpowered (you won't), it's so cost effective that you can over spray or reapply, or both actually! It's the sort of scent that a man with kids, mortgage and a half decent job would be happy to wear, but just as at home on a well dressed guy popping out for a bite to eat. Obviously office safe, also great whilst at and after the gym. I'll say it again, this is an absolute no brainer for £10 approx. Performance, great profile and aromatically fresh. Do your self a favour and discover a little gem.