Hudson Yards

A happy parfume, when I wear this I can really dive into spring season. Its bright and youthful. For me I get more freesia than lily of the valley, but those 2 flowers stand side by side. Impeccable for spring, and I think this one leans toward unisex, it's not very feminine, it's green floral, with good longevity and moderate silage.

This is a beautiful, classic, sparkling floral. It's of unmistakably high quality, and it actualizes visions of the first day of Spring in a neighborhood that is sure to be a paragon of éclat on the Hudson River.

I got a sample of this in the mail and was finally in the mood to wear it today since the temperature here on the east coast finally went up to the mid 70s. I'm not a huge fan of floral perfumes. Most of the time, they're just too overpowering and not quite right for me. This is a nice, well balanced rose blend that to me is best suited for early summer. I got very strong peony, rose and iris from this. Some litchi, honestly I didn't catch the pink pepper. The musk anchors, but doesn't overpower. It lasted probably about 4 hours from one spray dabbed between my wrists and neck. I see some comparisons to High Line and Madison Square Park. I've tried both of those. To me, High Line is all green/grass notes. I own Madison Square Park, which is perfect for the cool part of spring. More of a mingling of green notes and florals. Hudson Yards sits solidly in the florals part of this grouping, just to give you a sense of where it falls in relation to those 2. It's a very "pretty" perfume. One I would put on when I'm in a pretty, feminine dress, in a very girly mood. update: I've worn this for a few days now, using 3-4 sprays. The scent is completely gone within 4 hours no matter how much you use. I thought maybe I was just adjusting to it, but when I asked friends if they could detect any perfume, they said no. For this kind of money it needs to stay on much longer than 4 hours. It's too bad, because it really is a nice scent..

This is nice but nothing unique or special. At first spritz, it’s a fresh floral, freesia, Lilly of the valley & peony, it smells generic, like many other perfumes already out there. After about 15mins, that settles & I get the powdery iris, smells like those lipsticks from the 90s when you sniff up close. I get hints of the Bulgarian rose but it’s hard to detect because I mainly smell the iris. I don’t get litchi? I do see the similarities between this & Estée Lauder Pleasures, but that is more sharp. Overall, it’s a simple light floral, hint of powdery fragrance. Nice for the day, spring/summer, casual day to day because it’s not too “perfumy” or formal at all. I don’t think it’s worth the price tag.

Lovely floral spring scent from the House of Bond no 9 in NYC. The start and heart are floral fruity for the first hour followed by a drydown of powerful musk intertwined with iris and orange blossom. There is a lot of baby powder so if you are a powdery scent lover this scent is for you. The scent overall feels very feminine from beginning to end. Excellent longevity and projection so 1 spray will last all day (potent juice). Thumbs up!

I think this smells similar to High line, which I already own. It lasts almost 10 minutes on my skin before disappearing. I did buy this in the winter so to be fair I’ll try it in the warmer months and update my review... as for now definitely not full bottle or full price worthy.

Clean soapy floral, the rose is apparent and a bit sour.. There’s a sort of citrus hint... reminds me of an elevated rose and platinum rush from Paris Hilton, sillage could be better but over all a pleasing every day and inoffensive scent

I have a small sample of this and it’s delightful. The lily and freesia really project and it dries down to warm rose. It’s really bright and unique.

Lily of the valley couched in green, fresh and energetic. About as far as it gets from the odor of the old yards.

I like this one a lot! Slightly floral and citrus. Not as best as the other Bond's.

This is a pleasant, innocuous green floral with a soapy dry down. Generic but wearable and nice. But in no permeation of any rational reality should this cost what it costs. No way near worth the price. You can find this exact scent a million places for half the cost or less.

Too Green. As if the only note is grass.

Just received a sample of this. I like this fragrance, but I am not in love with it. This smells very mainstream and quite similar to Flora by Gucci Glamorous Magnolia after an hour upon application. When you compare the two, they have similar green notes, freesia, peony, musk and citrus notes. The litchi in Hudson Yards is very prominent in the opening, similar to the peach in Glamorous Magnolia. I cannot smell any pink pepper notes in the Hudson Yards. The sillage is soft to moderate with very litle longevity. The Flora by Gucci Glamorous Magnolia in its EDT strength lasts way longer than the Hudson Yards. For the price you pay for the Bond, I feel that the Gucci version with its co-ordinating lotion and shower gel is a better buy.

I grew up with my sister who religiously wore (and still wears it whenever she has) Estee Lauder Pleasures, so upon smelling this, I find it to be very similar but much more intense in every way. Lily of the Valley, Peony, and rose are up front and center for the floral accord. With unique floral sweetness of litchi, and something else that is slightly soapy that turns into a nice powdery intimacy. Hudson Yards is a very opulent floral fragrance for this 2014 spring/summer season. Not exactly redundant and it's a nice welcome to their "Park" collection.

Youthful-feeling, springy, fresh, pretty, uncomplicated. An office fragrance for the fresh out of college optimistic new girl at work. Plenty, and I do mean plenty, of LOTV and freesia. Something you might wear to a morning wedding. As a guest, not the bride. It's pleasant to smell but it's nothing special or new, and in general it's reminiscent of several other releases out right now (I'm thinking of Miu Miu Eau Rosee and the original Jason Wu) and so no one should be spending Bond prices on this.

Lovely.....but not me....very floral, very romantic. I am die hard Chinatown and New Haarlem girl. But this is so darn nice, I might have to spring for a bottle, sometime, but not now. I think a lot are going to love this new fragrance! It really is going to be another hit for Bond. I really do like it a lot, but I am not quite "in love" yet. Do yourself a favor a try to get a sample!

Bond really knows how to do florals. It’s a clean, white floral perfume on that classic musk base. It is non descript in its wear experience with is green freshness. Simply it’s a pretty girl perfume. There’s nothing not to like, nothing that is a standout. I do find similar to high line. If you like Green musky fragrances, youll like this one.

A sparkling, wet-petal floral, modestly candied I'd give this one a 7.5/10 It's a very likeable fragrance, balanced with the litchi and peony in harmony. The pepper oil and the musc absolue give it this misty-dewy texture that makes it very ageless. Great for Spring and Summer.

"Our dewy fresh spring 2014 eau de parfum celebrates a new beginning that hasn’t even begun yet."!!! OMG, they launch so many fragrances that there are no more available corners of NYC.

I agree Caist. I see you also have Bond haha. I got to smell it recently, got to agree with that sparkling feeling that Hudson has. Wonderful luxury perfume.