My Sin

The scent is pleasant, but not strikingly amazing. Very freshly fruity and a bit floral. I have no glue what the original My Sin smells like, so I can't compare them. They probably don't have anything in common, as this one is very light and modern, not a classic in any way. It smells like berries to me. The bottle is lovely and the scent is nice. I don't understand how there are so many dislikes, it's not disgusting or anything. I guess, people are comparing it with the original. I can only evaluate this one, and I admit I like it.

Madame Zed, the creator of the original masterpiece that was the first My Sin, must be turning in her grave over this. Everything about this reeks junk: the look of the bottle, the notes. A fruity-floral. The original was a complex work of art. Lanvin also did the same thing to vintage Lanvin Rumeur, put out some fruity floral that had no relation to the earthy, leathery vintage. And Fragrantica won't even put up a listing for the original because they want to advertise for the inferior modern version. Perfume history is real and should not be erased for the sake of commercialism. These soulless corporations who buy out old perfume companies so they can rip off the names of classics are a real bore.

This is impossible to review. The original My Sin by Lanvin was not this perfume. My mother wore the original My Sin and let me borrow it for dates. Well, actually i had to sneak it. It was intense stuff. What the heck this new junk is, i neither know nor care. Away with it.

It's like spray painting primer over a Rembrandt, drawing a stick figure on it and calling it art. Why not just release the original? WHY? And to top it off, the new crap is a fruity floral, which is the final insult. This house is dead to me now. Seriously it is.

Ridiculous!!!! A floral/fruity on top of it. Unbelievable! It was bad enough that Lanvin renamed another perfume Scandal but My Sin I cannot take. Such an amazing classic and now they name a `girly thing` like it.