Ungaro for Him

I have many bottles in my collection, expensive ones, Armani, Dior, YSL and so on. This one was just tested in 2014 in a store and it became my favourite. I weared this in summer and autumn, after some years I have bought a 100ml bottle again and I will keep it for my datings and special moments cause this parfum is magic! You don't like the bottle? It's not my problem. don't you like the smell? It's not my problem, girls go crazy when I wear this. It is a powdery and fresh scent, sexy and alluring. Some similarities with la nuit and davidoff hot water but this has got a brighter citrus opening and a sweet Ambroxan and woody base. Longevity is not the best, but with 25 euros I have again in my collection one of the best perfumes I've ever had. To me this is perfection. Sorry for my English and ciao from Italia!

very nice fresh & flowery aquatic quality fragrance in most horrible packaging & bottle ever! Use it for what it is (an eau de toilette) spay it very generously on your clothes & it will stay all day till night. Quiet impressive for a fresh fragrance. I happily do not smell any tobacco but lovely aquatic notes & some refreshing tea notes. No particular age for this one except if you are a bottle only fan! I guess young people will like it. To me it looks like the cheapest design & bottle I have ever seen. Especially from such a big house & brand! No idea what is the idea behind it. The shape & glass quality are fine but the print & top look horrible. we very happily do not wear the design but the fragrance. Lovely frag I surely will keep on wearing

I got this perfume by mistake , There are two fragrances with the same name from the same company , But when I smelled the perfume I really really love it , the bottle look Cheap but believe me It will surprise you

Did a total blind buy for this one. Starts off with the spikey citrus notes and has a bit of pepper in there as well. Has a fresh, clean, and slightly creamy smell. The sillage lasts for about 15 minutes and starts to quickly settle into the middle and base notes. The middle and base notes are very warm and sweet with that peppery smell still lingering a bit, but settles in the background of the warmer notes. I tested on the skin and clothing. I would suggest this being on the clothing as it will make the projection last a bit longer and to get more out of the top notes. I will honestly do a combo of skin and clothing, on the skin of my chest and shoulders of the shirt. Not a bad scent as it certainly outperforms the way its bottle looks which, I agree with everyone, looks cheap, but that's the whole book by its cover thing! Not a bad scent and glad to have it in my collection. Cheers!

Picked up a 1 oz bottle at Marshall's for $14.99. I usually have good luck with blind buys there, and there are quite a few Ungaro fragrances that I like; but this one was a total miss. This is not a long lasting fragrance by any stretch of the imagination. I got about an hour of longevity before it totally disappeared, and the sillage was really poor. As for the notes, I got a soft hit of citrusy grapefruit and pepper and minutes later I think I picked up a tea note and that was it. Like I said, within an hour, I could barely detect anything. Oh, and I agree with Michael, the bottle looks utterly horrendous.

With a 70% discount I was willing to take the chance of a blind buy. You get what you give, I presume. This is a flowery floral smell, not really bad but not groundbreaking either. Sillage is good, longitivtiy just a couple of hours. The smell matches the bottle, kinda cheap and for teens mostly, which is strange as the elderly will only understand the typewriting letters on the bottle. The concept of the bottle for me is a total blur. If it was a woman- or unisex cologne I would have understood it better. Ungaro used to make great colognes in the last century, but they lost it somehow. Pass this one, even with 70% off it's not a good buy!

I'm curious about the juice, but the bottle looks atrociously cheap, not unlike the one for Galliano's After Midnight, which he clearly had nothing to do with.