Grès
Cabochard Eau de Toilette 2019

Seu armário
Entre para dizer que você tem, já testou ou quer este perfume. Suas marcações ficam privadas por padrão.
Criar conta é grátis e leva menos de um minuto.
Acordes dominantes
- musgoso
- amadeirado
- aldeídico
- terroso
- couro
- fresco
Pirâmide olfativa
Coração
A personalidade do perfume, por algumas horas.
Fundo
O rastro que fica na pele até o fim do dia.
Como ele se comporta
Fixação, projeção e ocasião — votos da comunidade internacional somados aos daqui.
Gênero
11 votos
Quando usar
- Inverno: 5 votos
- Primavera: 8 votos
- Verão: 3 votos
- Outono: 9 votos
- Dia: 5 votos
- Noite: 6 votos
Onde encontrar
Nenhum decant à venda nem vaquinha aberta agora. Marque Quero ali em cima — é o interesse da comunidade que puxa a próxima vaquinha.
Ver vaquinhas abertasQuem gosta deste também gosta
Perfumes próximos no gosto de quem curte este — bons candidatos para o próximo decant.
Impressões da comunidade internacional
Traduções chegam aos poucos — textos em inglês por enquanto.
- em inglês
Yesterday I did a side by side comparison with this edition and the older but not vintage one (the long bottle with a bow in the front of the glass and simple black plastic cap). I find that the 2019 version is a bit harsher, stronger in the beginning and more dominant on leather, while the older version is softer and weeker and not as long lasting either. The older one is beautiful and non-offensive, comforting scent, a weeker sister of the older EDP, while the 2019 formula of the edt is rather differnt from the 2019 edp (sharper and more leathery) and strong enough in this edt concentration. It's class, but not dated, and pretty longlasting. Strong and edgy at first but later it becomes a warmer and more wearable scent that lingers beautifully. I love them both. I would choose the older one for a more discreet, softer and more comfortable result or layering under other perfumes, while the 2019 version is better in it's own, I guess, for a somewhat dark, leathery, modernized classic style. There is a difference in the drydown: the older edt is not as longlasting as the newest one, therefore the drydown is soft and beautiful but turns to only a shadow of itself within 2-3 hours, while the 2019 edt has that somewhat synthetic drydown many reformulated classic perfumes have (the lack of real oakmoss and other ingredients that have been banned), not as soft as the drydown of the older one, but at least it lasts way longer. Both versions are very beautiful, really, and they are recognizable as the two versions of the very same scent.
- em inglês
Blind bought this and just received it today. The bottle is very cute. It looks like it would house a Miss Dior type of scent. This scent, however, is far from a girly little thing. This is a chypre that punches you in the face with leather...so much leather. I do not dislike it, but as a chypre lover, I feel conflicted about this one. This feels like the olfactory equivalent of a cocaine fueled party in the late 70’s/early 80’s. Like the ones in the movie Boogie Nights. Lots of gold chains, lipgloss, leather jackets, cigarette smoke, and unprotected sex. The only place I could confidently wear this is to a speakeasy or in Vegas. The longevity is nuclear. No need to get the parfum. I took a shower and it didn’t budge. I’m about to go to sleep and I can still smell it. I’m anticipating my dreams to be extra smutty tonight. Edit - So I tried this several times, and I have to say, the dry down is pretty stunning. The leather takes a back seat (thankfully) and what’s left is an elegant powder with a smoky background. It’s the scent of a wealthy, well dressed woman of yesteryear....and her ashtray 🤣. It’s also very sultry, borderline skanky like Tabu...even though it smells nothing like Tabu. It has that same kind of aura about it. Very polarizing, vintage scent. I really like it. If Jessica Rabbit had a signature scent, I bet it would be this!
- em inglês
The reformulated version from 2019 is a reformulation of a reformulation... I've known this perfume since my childhood years and the original smells different from the later versions. Currently, there are two versions available, the reformulated stuff produced about ten or maybe even four years ago and the latest version (in a new bottle) from last year (2019). The old version is sharper in the drydown and has more vetiver. It's a bit more leathery, but nothing in comparison to the old Cabochard from the 60's. The vintage stands out for itself, it is a true sister of Bandit and a rare gem... (should you come across it, grab it!). As to the 2019 reformulation: I think it's a very pleasant, light, softer version of the last reformulation. The drydown is more synthetic, probably because of the lack of genuine oakmoss and other key ingredients, but I must say that is is one of the rare satisfying reformulations on the market, still true to the basic idea of Cabochard and very wearable, excellent both on men and women. For the price of approx. 20 Euros you get a very recognisable EdT, completely devoid of sweetness or any traces of fruit salad. By the way, if you are a sucker for the vintage Cabochard, try ARAMIS. It is quite similar to the real thing from the past.
- em inglês
While I'm aware there is no way the current formulation is identical to the original, it's still "Cabochard", and it smells better than I remember even. I bought both the EDP and the EDT because I wasn't sure which was better, and when they arrived I noticed something odd: The EDT is 80% alcohol by volume, (or 20% perfume), which is incredibly strong for a EDT, and the EDP is actually 21% perfume (79% alcohol), so there is hardly any real difference in strength. I thought then why is the EDP darker? If you look in the ingredients the EDP contains red coloring that the EDT lacks, which likely makes it look more intense. The EDT is dryer and a bit sharper, more "square" and unfussy. The EDP is rounder, plusher. I feel like the EDT would be more for daytime and the EDP for evening, if that makes any sense. I sense a bit more tobacco in the EDT, which makes me prefer it most. Both are close to Azuree, but less outdoorsy, a little more "conservative" and more severe, in a good way.
- em inglês
First, I love Cabochard. Conceptually, artistically, historically, there are few that compare. That said, I have not found the time of year to wear it that best suits me. Well, last night I finally found it. Spring, evening, 60ish degrees, and only 2 spritzes, because this girl is a purring beast, with soft luxurious fur. The temperate air really brought out the green in this fragrance. And with the modest 2 spritzes, it just enveloped me in its brazen green, ashen and floral leather glory. She maynot be for every day, but is still, with reformulations, an absolute masterpiece.
- em inglês
This was great value (£16.99 for a new bottle!) and it's really well-done, especially for a modern 'recreation'. It's a fairly out-there style of perfume to wear these days, but it's elegant, fierce and earthy all at once, which has to be good. That said, I have a weakness for this kind of perfume and own minis or FBs of l'Eau Scandaleuse, Nudiflorum, Rien and the treasured dregs of a sample vial of No 19 parfum - all kissing cousins - as a result of which I struggle to give Cabotine skin time. Must wear more.
- em inglês
At first you are hit with a pretty synthetic wave of pure florals, which then fades into a nice floral, woody, mossy leathery controlled scent. A very sophisticated scent without as much smokiness as I've seen people claim. The drydown is leather with some supporting rose. For the price an incredible fragrance and a relatively safe blind buy as well. If I had to sum it up in one scene, it would be a clean, waxed leather purse in the middle of a flower field.
- em inglês
I own many vintage bottles in various concentrations and both the 2019 EDT & EDP. This EDT is greener than the EDP, and despite being a reformulation, still Cabochard all the way. I'm as enthusiastic about this version as I am the vintages. Appropriate to attribute this to Bernard Chant, as it honors the original as best as modern ingredients allow. Leather chypre lovers should try both, and for the price, it's not a bad blind buy.
- em inglês
Similar to the other versions. Maybe a bit more gentle. Not as green as the last JM or as dry as Bandit. Not at all like Knowing which is not for me. Closer to magie noire than that. I asked my 5 year old if this smelled good on me or bad on me. She chose good emphatically. Feels sexy. Could be good for layering as well. Into it.
- em inglês
Bernard Chant's first step in his never-ending quest for the perfect chypre. Gorgeous green smoky leather, lighter and brighter than Bandit, a tad more rounded than Aramis (both real gems too), a must try for every cigarette smoker - and for every chypre fanatic.
- em inglês
For comparison's sake, a lighter, more floral version of Aramis. It's very good and I'm glad I bought it...but I have difficulty imaging it would appeal as wearable to most women these days.
- em inglês
Its very unique(old school, not a crowd pleaser). Its similar to the edp version, but its weaker in sillage and longevity. But still its great and I like it.
- em inglês
Too smudgily smooth for a proper man’s wear.
- em inglês
I'm a Bernard Chant man and a certified chypretard. But I will need to submit a follow-up review after more wears. This is the first perfume I've had evolve backwards on me. The top was mildly aldehydic, but plenty of chypre pushed through the mesh of effervescent soapiness. I was reminded, at once, of Paloma Picasso as well as Chant's own classic chypres, Aramis, 900, and Aromatics Elixir. There's clearly a particular DNA to a Chant chypre that's immediately as recognizable as his Walt Disney smile. But this all evaporated and I was left with almost pure aldehydes, smelling like Ivory soap the rest of the day. Not a complaint, as I don't mind smelling clean. But I already have plenty of fougères for that barber shop shaving lather soap smell I need to give this a week, sometime, to figure out if this reverse dry down is particular to me permanently, or if this is just an instance of a similar tempermentality to Montana PDP, which sometimes gives me celery days that last an entire shift at work. Edit: No matter how much I wear this, I want to scrub it. I love Bernard Chant. I want to love this, but I can't. I definitely tried. It must be a personal quirk of my biology, but I swear this evolves on me in reverse, as stated above. The classic Chant chypre DNA is fleeting, as in only lasting minutes on my skin, before it's violently paved-over by a carpet bombing of aldehydic greenness that only builds and builds into a celery Tower of Babel I wish God would smite. I envy anyone on whom this works, because none of its notes are really apparent to me. It's depressing.
- em inglês
I have compared the new edt, 2019 with the last release of Gres Cabochard- the one we can still buy today. And I must tell you, that a lot of things have changed! Thirst, the tobacco is gonne,the vetiver, the sandalwood ( all though listed, theres is dev. no sandalwood in here in the edt), which gives the fragrance a sweet, warm and cosy smel. Just look at the notes of the last version compared to the new edt. There are a lot of notes missing and to be honest, I am dissapointed:-( comparing them side by side, there is just no depht in the new edt and it is harsher and just mehh. I am gonna try the edp version of 2019 and let you know. Shure, it is a bit longer lasting, like a reviewer mentioned, and the leather is more pronounced. If that`s what you want, go for it; but if you aprecciate the complexity of Gres Cabochard, as it use to be and still is in the versions, still on the market, the be warned!
- em inglês
I'm astonished. Perfume is such a subjective experience but this time I get everything people tend to mention with this fragrance. Never had anything like it! I was hoping for earthy and I get that in abundance. It makes me feel submerged in the forest floor. It makes me think of someone putting out a cigarette against tree bark. It makes me think of someone resurrected... at the opening, there is nothing human to it. As such, it feels odd, unlively and harsh applied on warm skin. Medicinal, perhaps alchemical. Green, heavy, dry, dark, sharp, bitter, herbal, vegetal, enveloping (but in a disquieting way). Necromantic is what I'd call it. Edit: Does indeed dry into a wonderful, wearable leather with a floral sweetness. I'm puzzled.
- em inglês
I blind bought this on my journey to find cheaper unisex perfumes and let's say, this is a nice scent for someone who wants to smell like a chain smoker who drenched themselves in cheap body spray. This is - what for me - this fragrance smells like. I looked at the notes before purchasing and was like hey this has all the flowers I love and I doubt the leather can be that bad. Sadly the leather is so overwhelming that it ruins the whole fragrance for me. Leather mixed with aldehydes is giving brushing your teeth with cigarettes. If you love strong leather and cigarettes, go for it. Sadly, this isn't for me.
- em inglês
How in love I was with the idea of this one. I bought it years ago, blindly, enamored by the bottle. It was insulting to smell. It had an unnatural quality to it, like dishes left in the sink for days in polished perfume form. Agressive, masculine in a toxic, musky and overwhelming reading. I could have imagined the alcheid elements blended with softer, less contradictory elements forming something interesting and complex, but it was a far cry from it on my skin. Insult to injury, I smelled something exactly like this on a man I was seeing at the time, which too was a mistake.
- em inglês
Dry sharp full of leather and impossibly strong. Made me assured I dislike leather in perfumes.
- em inglês
To me, this smells like cigarettes. I almost died.
Resenhas da comunidade
0 comentáriosEntre na sua conta para comentar e resenhar.
EntrarAinda ninguém resenhou este perfume
Seja a primeira pessoa a contar como ele se comporta na pele: projeção, fixação e a ocasião certa.
Encontrou um erro ou falta informação? A comunidade melhora o catálogo junto.





